Interaction Between Type 2 Diabetes Prevention Strategies and Genetic Determinants of Coronary Artery Disease on Cardiometabolic Risk Factors.

Diabetes. 2020;69(1):112-120

Plain language summary

Individual risk of Coronary Artery Disease (CAD) and type 2 diabetes reflects the interplay between lifestyle behaviours acting on a backdrop of genetic predisposition. The aim of this study was to examine whether type 2 diabetes prevention strategies, either an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILS) or metformin treatment (MET), modify the association between CAD genetic risk and cardiometabolic risk factors (CRFs) in participants at high risk of type 2 diabetes. The study is a randomised controlled trial were participants were randomly allocated to one of the three groups; ILS (n = 1,079), MET (850 mg twice daily [n = 1,073]), or placebo (n = 1,082). Results indicate that there weren’t major significant differences in baseline characteristics, except for lower high-density lipoprotein and higher triglyceride in the placebo individuals compared with individuals assigned to MET or ILS. In fact, either an ILS or MET has a beneficial effect on 1-year change in different CRFs. Authors conclude that type 2 diabetes–preventive strategies for individuals at high risk of type 2 diabetes provide beneficial effects on CRFs regardless of CAD genetic risk profile.

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is more frequent among individuals with dysglycemia. Preventive interventions for diabetes can improve cardiometabolic risk factors (CRFs), but it is unclear whether the benefits on CRFs are similar for individuals at different genetic risk for CAD. We built a 201-variant polygenic risk score (PRS) for CAD and tested for interaction with diabetes prevention strategies on 1-year changes in CRFs in 2,658 Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) participants. We also examined whether separate lifestyle behaviors interact with PRS and affect changes in CRFs in each intervention group. Participants in both the lifestyle and metformin interventions had greater improvement in the majority of recognized CRFs compared with placebo (P < 0.001) irrespective of CAD genetic risk (P interaction > 0.05). We detected nominal significant interactions between PRS and dietary quality and physical activity on 1-year change in BMI, fasting glucose, triglycerides, and HDL cholesterol in individuals randomized to metformin or placebo, but none of them achieved the multiple-testing correction for significance. This study confirms that diabetes preventive interventions improve CRFs regardless of CAD genetic risk and delivers hypothesis-generating data on the varying benefit of increasing physical activity and improving diet on intermediate cardiovascular risk factors depending on individual CAD genetic risk profile.

Lifestyle medicine

Fundamental Clinical Imbalances : Hormonal ; Structural
Environmental Inputs : Diet ; Nutrients ; Physical exercise
Personal Lifestyle Factors : Nutrition ; Exercise and movement
Functional Laboratory Testing : Blood

Methodological quality

Jadad score : 3
Allocation concealment : Yes

Metadata